Undoubtedly, having a conflict in our perspective with anyone is an integral part of our routine lives and human interactions. And it usually takes place in the most unexpected situation.
One such popular confrontation took place at the Maplewood High School. The argument happened when a teacher Emma argues with Principal Figgins. This conflict later shed light on various perspectives and complexities of
- School administration
- Student activism
- The delicate balance between individual and authority rights.
Let’s delve into the details of this heated argument and see the implications of such disagreements in the educational realm.
Who are Emma Pillsbury and Principal Figgins?
Both these are the central characters in “Glee”. Each of them embodied unique values and perspectives of themselves within the school’s ecosystem.
Their interaction, mainly the scene when Emma argues with Principal Figgins played a pivotal role in understanding Glee’s narrative.
- Emma Pillsbury
Emma primarily acts as a compassionate counsellor of the school. Her key characteristics included a strong sense of ethics, a caring nature, and keen dedication to her students. Moreover, she also acted as a moral compass within Maplewood High School.
Role in Argument
Emma argues with Principal Figgins particularly for the Glee club. She mainly stemmed from her advocacy for her student’s arts and welfare.
- Principal Figgins
The principal, Figgins, portrayed the character of an administrative authority representative. He was concerned with the school’s reputation and budget primarily, often leading to major conservative decisions.
Role in Conflict
His confrontation with the students’ compass, Emma, highlighted a significant stress between student-centric interests and administrative decisions.
Why Emma Argues with Principal Figgins?
The Base of the Argument
The argument occurred between Emma and Principal Figgins of Maplewood High School, sparked a popular conflict that became viral.
Emma, the dedicated school counselor, wished to implement a new teaching method. Her approach was basically centred on interactive learning and student engagement. The argument with principal Figgins’s preference, however, was for structured and time-tested methodologies.
The Stance of Principal Figgins
Mr. Figgins acted as a veteran in Maplewood School’s educational administration department. He stood firm on the basic discipline principles and orders. Also, he firmly beholds the proven effectiveness of the various traditional teaching methods implemented already.
He argues with Emma that the predictability and stability of the traditional teaching method have always presented a secure learning environment for all students. Moreover, he emphasized the sheer importance of standardized testing and measurable outcomes, viewing them as the most necessary tools for assessing both teachers’ and students’ performance.
Emma Pillsbury’s Perspective
Contrary to Principal Figgins’s stance, Emma advocated for a more student-centered and dynamic approach to teaching. She emphasizes the significance of catering to fostering critical thinking and learning different styles for adding creativity to students.
Moreover, she criticizes the traditional educational system, saying that it often fails to fully engage the students. She says today’s educational system needs to be flexible enough for all students to be able to adapt according to their individual needs.
The Core of the Whole Argument
The situation when Emma argues with Principal Figgins basically revolves around the role of a teacher as well as the purpose of education. According to Emma’s beliefs, education must be like a holistic process primarily aimed at developing creative and all-rounded individuals. As an instructor, she foresees her role as not just as a regular teacher, but as a facilitator of guiding students to think and work independently.
Key Takeaways
Emma’s passion and goodwill for environmental stability ultimately led to the approval of her club, showcasing the potential to bring an innovative change when all students are committed to a specific stance. In contrast, in his role as an administrator, Principal Figgins learned the importance of fostering an open and supportive environment for students’ initiatives.
However, while the scene where Emma argues with Principal Figgins may be fictional, but such cases often bring real-world insights and lessons.
Following are the key takeaways valuable not only for administrators and educators but for all students having such conflicts in professional settings:
- Understanding different perspectives
The persistent defence of the arts and student welfare primarily emphasized the need for advocates who prioritize students’ needs in educational systems.
- Importance of Advocacy
This conflict highlighted the key significance of considering various viewpoints and acknowledging the limitations and challenges faced by the school administrators.
- Effective communication for a solution to end a conflict
Moreover, arguments like those of Emma and Figgins also demonstrate the power of negotiation and effective communication in reaching mutual understanding while resolving conflicts.
FAQS
Why Emma argues with Principal Figgins?
Emma Pillsbury, a compassionate counselor of Maplewood High School argues with its principal Mr. Figgins in “Glee”. The argument occurred due to the difference in both of their opinions and perspectives on various school-related issues.
What was the conflict all about?
The conflict between Emma and Mr Figgins was related to several school issues including
- School Policies
- Disciplinary actions
- Academic standards
- Students rights
- Extracurricular activities, and many more.
How did the argument begin?
Emma argues with Principal Figgins over dissatisfaction and concern with an action or a decision conducted without considering students. The conflict is initiated when Emma puts forward her major concerns as a student counselor.
How did Emma present her opinions during the conflict?
During this popular argument, Emma expresses her suggestions by voicing her significant student related concerns. She also presented evidence to support her opinions, occasionally challenging the reasoning and authority of Principal Figgins.
Conclusion
The “Glee” scene where Emma argues with Principal Figgins primarily serves as a microcosm of the worldly challenges that can possibly arise in our educational systems. Also, such arguments highlight the key responsibilities and complexities that come along with sharing the prospects of modern educational institutions.
However, while such arguments may be inevitable, it is crucial to handle and address them constructively. These disputes can be readily resolved by
- Clarifying misunderstandings
- Building trust in other person with valid points
- Finding innovative and creative solutions
- Maintaining a healthy conversation
- Making a positive school environment
Finding common ground strategies and solutions through these ways can undoubtedly prove beneficial for both students and educational administrators.
Read More Posts on Mind Setterz Here.