Singapore has one of the best education systems in the world. The Singapore government is quite responsive and supportive of its education system and set up policies that favor the country’s learning system. The policies are meritocracy and bilingual. Meritocracy is an educational aspect where student academic performance is a significant determinant of a child’s career in the future. The government’s implementation of the bilingual policies encouraged students to learn both English and their ethnic languages. Moreover, the Singapore government established an educational policy that does not deprive any child access to education irrespective of their socioeconomic status. The policy makes it possible for low-income families to obtain financial aid and scholarship programs. Schools also established schemes to assist students in coping with financial challenges. The country receives high returns on its investments and supports its education system, enabling Singapore’s fast economic growth and development. The high returns are possible since the education system takes a holistic approach to learning, which encourages students to develop values such as respect, integrity, harmony, and responsibility and enable them to take up leadership positions in the future.
However, the system has its disadvantages. The high academic performance focuses on learning and not remembering since the primary focus is passing examinations. This learning system only benefits successful students because they receive awards in the education and economic system. The situation creates an environment where children feel unaccepted. Singapore’s education system adopts the “spoon-feeding” learning approach rather than discovering student talent and interest. The education system also ignores the need for soft skills among students, resulting in a majority of them lacking communication skills. The problems in the education sector in one way or another affect a student’s well-being, making it essential to study youth.
State of Well-Being
A state of student well-being is a condition where there are proper physical, emotional, and cognitive functions, resulting in successful performance. The elements of well-being determine an individual’s ability to perform productive activities, have strong social skills, build social relationships, and solve problems in life or academics. A student with proper well-being will create a sense of satisfaction and a successful cognitive function directed towards achieving one’s potential or objective. Student well-being is vital in the education sector because school life makes up a high percentage of students’ lives. Therefore, there is more time spent in school than at home or social gatherings. School life established a life stage where there is the driving need to have accomplishments, develop good relationships, and find one’s life purpose. A student can achieve all this with positive well-being.
The Issues in the Education Sector That Affect State of Well-Being
Singapore’s focus on academic performance creates an unwelcome learning environment for students, and results in stress and anxiety. A study by Lini & Gaurav showed that in the sample of students from various schools in Singapore, 86% of students were worried about receiving low grades in their academics. The rate is substantial compared to the global stress average, which is 66%. The same study showed that 76% of their students’ sample was anxious about the examination and their academic results. The rate is high, considering that students’ average anxiety level across the globe is 55%. Rahman, Warsah, & Murphy and Pak built upon this research by asserting that these two factors result in an adverse effect on students’ well-being because they reduce students’ resilience to withstand future challenges. Choun and Ng also added to the argument, maintaining that the system’s focus on academic competition creates a learning environment founded by neoliberalism, which results in growing anxieties. The statistics created the need for Singapore’s education system to refine its knowledge outcomes and encourage lifelong skills learning. When students from Singapore enter international colleges and universities, they face too many problems, as no one is any longer “spoon-feeding” knowledge for them. Statistics show that they overcome this issue very fast, but may experience difficulties in the first one or two semesters. In case you face a similar problem, feel free to address one of the professional essay writing services, such as https://smartwritingservice.com. Here, you will find experienced academic writers who will write custom quality papers for you. Asking for online assistance fast enough, spares you more time to adjust to the new system, and also helps to save money, as the earlier you order, the less you pay.
The “spoon-feeding” approach to education creates a challenge where it is challenging to execute reforms despite the government advising schools to implement improvements. Spoon-feeding makes it more demanding to adopt the global education trends into Singapore’s education sector. The schooling system should not compromise its educational quality and results by utilizing unsupportive educational strategies. The education sector outlook creates autonomy, making it hard to implement digital literacy and diminishing students’ access to new skills such as communication and cultural skills, enhancing empowerment and self-awareness. Murphy indicates why students will feel deprived of benefits that come with the digital age. Learners are in a time where everything among the youth revolves around the internet and the digital world. The failure of Singapore’s education system to implement current education trends due to challenges like participatory culture and unethical digital practices will only diminish students’ ability to learn creatively and expressively.
The Singapore government argues that the meritocracy and education policies implemented in Singapore’s education system allow it to apply soft authoritarianism towards the country’s education system. This aspect makes it challenging to impose changes in the education sector because the government will only implement strategies that will foster social stability and boost the economy. Chiong & Dimmock assert that executing the strategies will diversify the education system but still have a strong foundation whereby ‘if someone has talent and effort they can achieve educational and professional success.’ The government believes it will be beneficial to students since there is the protection of hardworking students from nepotism, and it is a fair way to allocate resources in the education sector. However, Ng and Choo argue that the policies had an adverse effect because they enable educational inequalities in the system. The result of this is parents spending more on tuition and extracurricular activities, allowing students to remain competitive in their academics. Additionally, government actions in the education sector lead to parents bearing a high cost to educate their children.
Singapore saw the adverse impact of its so-called perfect education system on students. The government addressed this through the implementation of the SkillsFuture program in 2016. The program combined all shareholders in the education sector and developed a new educational approach to social stability, where there is an increase in educational opportunities and an overall transformation of the learning system. The program will assist the government to diversify Singapore’s economy and increase its competitive advantage. The feat is achievable because the program will create an education system that encourages students to be innovative.. The education system will no longer be a route to a better life or a measure of success but a platform for social and digital interaction that encourages productive activities. The system will bring out a successful student who will make the economy thrive in the future.